Development4 min read

Sleep training methods compared: CIO, Ferber, Fading and more

Sponsored

Quick answer: Sleep training is one of the most debated topics in parenting — and one where the gap between evidence and parenting culture is wide.

Sleep training is one of the most debated topics in parenting — and one where the gap between evidence and parenting culture is wide. Here’s an honest, evidence-based comparison of the main approaches, without the ideology.

What Sleep Training Actually Is

Sleep training refers to any method that teaches a baby to fall asleep independently — at bedtime and when waking between sleep cycles. The goal is for baby to settle themselves back to sleep after normal partial wakings rather than signaling for caregiver intervention each time. Sleep training does not mean leaving a baby alone indefinitely, nor does it mean babies don’t have genuine needs at night. The question it addresses is: can a baby learn to settle themselves, and at what age and how? The evidence consistently shows that sleep training methods, when applied from 4–6 months onward, are safe and effective, improve parental wellbeing, and do not cause harm to infant attachment or emotional development.

Graduated Extinction: The Ferber Method

Ferber Method (graduated extinction or ‘controlled crying’): Put baby down drowsy but awake. Leave the room. If baby cries, return after a set interval (1 minute, then 3 minutes, then 5 minutes) to briefly check in and reassure without picking up or feeding. Gradually increase intervals. Evidence: strong — multiple RCTs show Ferber reduces night wakings and improves maternal mood without adverse effects on child cortisol, attachment, or behavior at 12-month follow-up. Best for: families who can tolerate structured crying intervals, from 4–6 months onward.

Full Extinction: Cry It Out (CIO)

Full extinction (unmodified CIO): Put baby down awake. Leave the room. Do not return until morning (except for feeds if still needed). No check-ins. Evidence: highly effective — often faster resolution than Ferber. Cochrane reviews find no differences in child outcomes compared to graduated methods or no sleep training. Best for: families with very consistent resolve. Often harder emotionally than graduated methods. From 4–6 months onward.

The Fading Method

Fading (also called ‘chair method’, ‘sleep lady shuffle’, or ‘camping out’): Caregiver gradually moves their presence further from baby’s sleep space over successive nights. Start beside the crib, move to the doorway, then outside the room, then check-ins only. Evidence: effective, though typically slower resolution than extinction methods. Less crying during the process. Best for: families who need caregiver presence during initial learning. From 4–6 months.

Pick-Up-Put-Down (PUPD)

PUPD: When baby cries, pick them up until calm, then put down before fully asleep. Repeat as needed. Evidence: less well-studied; variable effectiveness; can be inadvertently stimulating for some babies (being picked up repeatedly restimulates them). Best for: families wanting a lower-crying approach, from 4–5 months — though results are more variable.

No-Cry Approaches

No-cry approaches (including those outlined by Elizabeth Pantley and others) focus on gradually reducing feeding and holding to sleep through slow substitution rather than any crying period. Evidence: limited RCT data; effective for some families with significant patience. Take longer to achieve consolidation. Best for: families philosophically opposed to any crying, understanding that the process is slower.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does sleep training cause harm to babies?

The current body of evidence — including long-term follow-up studies — consistently shows no adverse effects on infant attachment, cortisol levels, stress reactivity, behavioral development, or maternal sensitivity from sleep training applied from 4–6 months. The 2020 Cochrane review of behavioral sleep interventions found improvements in infant sleep, maternal mood, and family functioning with no harm identified. Concerns about ‘toxic stress’ from cry-based methods are not supported by the evidence when methods are used as intended.

What age can I start sleep training?

The developmentally appropriate starting age is generally 4–6 months, when circadian rhythms are established, infant sleep architecture has matured, and babies have the cognitive capacity to learn new associations. Before 4 months, night waking is biological and driven by genuine nutritional need. Sleep training before 4 months is not recommended.

Which sleep training method is best?

The best method is the one you can implement consistently, given your family’s temperament, infant’s characteristics, and tolerance for the process. All evidence-based methods work when applied consistently. Inconsistency — starting a method, stopping when crying intensifies, then restarting — is the primary predictor of poor outcomes.

Found this helpful? Sign up to the LylyMama newsletter for evidence-based baby development guides delivered to your inbox every week.

Medical context only

This content supports decision-making but does not replace advice from your GP, midwife, health visitor or paediatric clinician.